Thursday, February 14, 2008
New Poll: Choose your (green) President
Hi everyone. I just posted a new poll, in the spirit of the primaries and the election excitement that promises to continue until November. Pretty straight-forward. I think it'd be interesting to hear some comments on this one, too, so feel free to leave a message on this post after you vote.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Could you summarize their positions on "being green" but with more information? Isn't Hillary saying anything besides 55 by 2030? Would you say more about the "global energy forum" and Barrack's position?
We really need this information.
You can find a complete profile of the candidates positions by searching “candidate name green environmental position.” In a nutshell, the backbone of the candidates positions are:
Obama would enact a $150 billion, 10-year plan to slash greenhouse gas emissions by 80% and invest in renewable and alternative energy technology, including biofuels and clean coal.
Clinton proposes a $50 billion Strategic Energy Fund, paid for in part by oil companies, to fund investments in alternative energy. The SEF will finance one-third of the $150 billion ten-year investment in a new energy futures.
I see the core message as, “how to go green” and still “rake in the green” from a corporate standpoint. Change cant just be good for the people or the environment, there needs to be a better bottom line for corporate America...
Dave at Alternate-Power.org
Post a Comment